Science Competitions
Science Olympiad, Regeneron ISEF, Regeneron STS, MATHCOUNTS, AMC/AIME/USA(J)MO, Science Fair, and Engineering Design competitions are taken seriously by selective colleges, especially for STEM applicants. In your description, specify your event or category, your team's record or placement, and any individual honors. In the honors section, list any placement above the regional level; a strong showing at states or nationals is a genuinely differentiating credential that most applicants don't have.
Research Experience
Research is the highest-signal STEM activity available to a high school student. Your description should specify your research question, methodology, and any outcome, not just the name of the program or institution. 'Investigated effect of microplastics on Daphnia behavior using controlled exposure assays; presented at regional ISEF' tells an officer far more than 'Research internship at university lab,' which could describe anything from genuine bench work to photocopying for a lab you visited twice.
Coding and Technology Projects
If you've built apps, developed software, contributed to open-source projects, or created tools with real users, describe this with specifics: language or framework, user count, problem solved, or GitHub activity. These projects demonstrate applied technical capability that abstract test scores cannot, and they're often the strongest evidence a CS-track applicant has, more convincing than any AP score.
Math Activities
MATHCOUNTS, AMC 8/10/12, AIME, USAMO/JMO, math circles, and math olympiad preparation programs are all worth listing. Include your highest score or level reached. Math olympiad achievement, particularly USAMO or USAJMO qualification, is one of the strongest possible STEM signals in an application; it's a credential that's essentially impossible to fake and immediately legible to any STEM-focused reader.
What Actually Separates Strong STEM Entries
A student I advised had two STEM entries that looked similar on paper: a robotics club and an independent coding project. The robotics entry read as generic ('Member, robotics club, 2 years') while the coding entry named exactly what he'd built ('Developed a Python tool used by 40+ classmates to track AP exam study progress; 200+ commits on GitHub'). The second entry did more work in fewer characters because it was concrete, verifiable, and specific about impact. When you have limited space, prioritize the entries you can make concrete over the ones that only sound impressive by title.
Mistakes Students Make
- Naming the institution or program instead of the actual question or project
- Listing competition participation without the result, even a modest one
- Burying a genuinely independent project inside a generic 'STEM club' entry
- Listing AP scores below a 4 in the honors section, where they add nothing
- Treating every science-adjacent activity as equally worth a slot rather than prioritizing the most specific and verifiable ones
Strong grades and test scores, but not sure what actually differentiates a STEM applicant?
The STEM Myth breaks down exactly what elite programs look for beyond the transcript, and the specific moves that turn a solid STEM profile into a genuinely distinctive one.
Get the Book