The test-optional movement changed admissions policy at hundreds of schools, but scholarship policy is a separate system that families frequently overlook until it's too late to fix.
Admissions policy and scholarship policy are not the same thing
When a school advertises itself as "test-optional," that label almost always refers specifically to first-year admission decisions. Many of those same schools maintain a separate, still-active testing requirement for merit scholarship programs, honors college admission, or specific competitive majors. A student can be fully admitted to a test-optional school with no scores submitted, and simultaneously be ineligible for an $8,000-a-year merit scholarship at that same school because the scholarship committee, unlike the admissions committee, still requires a minimum SAT or ACT score. This distinction is buried in scholarship program pages, not admissions pages, which is exactly why families miss it.
State merit programs are the biggest blind spot
State-funded merit scholarship programs, Georgia's HOPE Scholarship, Florida's Bright Futures, Tennessee Promise, West Virginia PROMISE, and similar programs in other states, almost universally require standardized test scores as part of their eligibility formula, regardless of what any individual college's admissions policy says. If your state runs a merit program like this, a decision to skip testing because a target school is "test-optional" can quietly disqualify your family from state funding worth thousands of dollars a year, entirely separate from anything the college itself decides.
How to actually check this, school by school
- Search each target school's site specifically for "merit scholarship requirements" or "scholarship eligibility," not just its general admissions testing policy
- Check honors program requirements separately, these frequently have their own, stricter testing thresholds
- Look up your state's merit scholarship program eligibility criteria if one exists, independent of any college's own policy
- When in doubt, take the SAT or ACT at least once, it preserves every option and costs you nothing if you ultimately choose not to submit the score for admission
Why taking the test anyway is usually the safer default
The practical asymmetry here favors testing in almost all cases. Taking the SAT or ACT costs a few hours and a modest fee, and it preserves full flexibility: you can submit a strong score if it helps your application, withhold a weak one at any test-optional school, and remain eligible for merit or state scholarships that require a score regardless of admissions policy. Choosing not to test at all removes that flexibility permanently and, for students in states with test-dependent merit programs, can be a costlier decision than families realize until scholarship letters arrive.
A situation I've seen repeatedly
I've worked with families who chose not to test at all because their top-choice school was fully test-optional, only to discover in the spring that the school's most generous merit scholarship tier required a minimum SAT score they now couldn't provide. In every case, the fix would have been simple months earlier: take the test once, keep the option open, and decide later whether to submit it for admission. The decision not to test at all is the one that's hard to undo once scholarship notifications start going out.
Don't leave scholarship money on the table
The Hidden Scholarship Playbook shows you exactly where merit and scholarship dollars actually come from, and how to make sure your family qualifies for every one you're eligible for.
Find Hidden Scholarships